Why privacy and accessibility belong in the same platform

Why manage consent and accessibility together?

It makes sense to run cookie consent and accessibility controls together because both do their work in your visitor's browser. Each one is a script on the page, with settings to configure, records worth keeping, and upkeep that never quite ends. If you buy them separately, you end up with two vendors, two dashboards, two invoices, and two tags competing for the same page load.

You don't need to become an expert in either field to run a site responsibly. On a given Tuesday, you mostly need to know what's enabled, what changed since last month, and whether anything needs your attention. Those are operations questions, and they're easier to answer when both jobs are handled from one place.

One script, and only the modules you switch on

UserGuard puts both jobs on a single script. The consent banner and the accessibility widget are separate modules with a per-site toggle, so you can start with cookie compliance and turn the widget on later without adding a second tag or a second vendor.

The widget gives visitors controls that adjust the page for them: text size up to 140 percent, contrast, reduced motion, a readable font, link highlighting, focus indicators, desaturation, and a larger cursor. Their choices are stored on their own device, so an accessibility preference doesn't become a tracking problem.

On the banner side, accept and reject are drawn as the same button, and the preference center has its own one-click reject all. You add translations from 22 language presets or any language tag, and the banner picks one from the visitor's browser language.

The records live together too

Your records also build up in one place. Every consent choice goes into an append-only log with the site, banner version, region, language, any Global Privacy Control signal, the per-category decision, hashed visitor and IP identifiers, and a timestamp. You can export it as CSV when a lawyer or a client asks.

Documents come from the same site record. UserGuard generates cookie policy drafts from what its scanner verified, along with accessibility statement drafts. They're versioned, and they're always for a person to review before publishing.

So when someone asks what your site was doing in March, you can get both answers from the same place.

Does one platform make you compliant?

No. Combining the two jobs doesn't make either one smaller. A banner doesn't make you GDPR compliant, and no widget makes a site ADA compliant. Accessible design is work in your templates and content, and a script can't do it for you. Ask your counsel which laws reach your business. None of this is legal advice.

UserGuard is also newly launched and doesn't have a long track record yet, so treat the workflow described here as design intent backed by a 30-day money-back guarantee. What we can offer today is fewer moving parts, and records for both obligations that stay in your control.

A ten-minute audit you can run today

Open your busiest page and count the compliance scripts on it. Count the dashboards you'd need to check to answer one question about that page. Then ask what each tool would let you take with you if you dropped it tomorrow.

If you end up with three tags, four logins, and nothing you can take with you, it's worth spending an afternoon on consolidating. Our pricing is per site, with volume discounts applied automatically, so the math is easy to do while you decide.

Go deeper: privacy + accessibility in one platform · the accessibility widget